Skip to main content

Sen. Klobuchar says Big Tech money hasn’t stopped her antitrust push ... yet

“It is an incredible amount of money I’m up against.”

Senator Amy Klobuchar sitting and smiling onstage while counting off talking points on her fingers.
Senator Amy Klobuchar sitting and smiling onstage while counting off talking points on her fingers.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar talks about her antitrust bills at this year’s Code Conference.
Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media
Sara Morrison
Sara Morrison was a senior Vox reporter who covered data privacy, antitrust, and Big Tech’s power over us all for the site since 2019.

Amy Klobuchar’s antitrust push is not dead, the Democratic senator told Kara Swisher at the Code Conference on Tuesday.

“Never count us out when the cause is right and it’s something we need to tackle,” she said.

Klobuchar has been at the forefront of the antitrust push in Congress, sponsoring several bipartisan and bicameral bills aimed at Big Tech that would better regulate them and curb their immense power. Despite auspicious beginnings and what seemed to be a lot of bipartisan interest in passing at least some of those bills, they seem to have stalled out. Some haven’t made any progress at all; others are waiting for a floor vote that never seems to come.

“You need some kind of rules in place where you don’t have the gatekeepers also controlling who wins in the marketplace,” she said.

The American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICO) is one of those bills, and it’s the one Klobuchar has arguably championed the most aggressively. It would ban dominant digital companies from giving their own products preference over those made by others on the platforms they own. So Amazon wouldn’t be allowed to put its own products higher up in search results in its Marketplace unless those products organically earned that spot, and Google wouldn’t be allowed to put its own maps or reviews above those offered by other companies in Google search results unless its maps and reviews earned that spot.

AICO is the only bill from the antitrust package to pass through both the House and Senate committee markups. As Klobuchar pointed out, it’s also the first competition bill since the beginning of the internet to advance to the Senate floor. All that’s left for it to head to the White House to get signed into law are two floor votes. In the Senate, it’s been waiting for a vote since January; in the House, it’s been waiting for over a year. Democratic leaders Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer haven’t even scheduled a vote. It’s not clear why: Klobuchar and some of AICO’s sponsors, including Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), say that the bill has enough votes between the two parties to pass the Senate. Schumer has said he’s not so sure about that, and won’t put it up for a vote until he is.

Klobuchar wouldn’t give an exact date for a vote or guarantee it’ll happen before midterms. She did say that the reason for the delay isn’t partisan dithering over content moderation, as has been reported. It’s the time it takes for even bipartisan bills to pass, and it’s the money. Specifically, the amount of money the companies her bill targets have spent fighting it through lobbying and ads.

“It is really hard to take on these subjects when you have the biggest companies the world has ever known, that control an inordinate part of the economy, opposed to it,” she said. “It is an incredible amount of money I’m up against. I have two lawyers. They have 2,800 lawyers and lobbyists. So I’m not naive about the David versus Goliath.”

But Klobuchar also suggested that the deadline many have cited for the bills to pass — the midterm elections, when Republicans are predicted to take control of one or both houses of Congress — may not be a hard and fast one. Plenty of Republicans want Big Tech to have some guardrails, and she thinks they’ll continue on if they get control. She also doesn’t see them getting that control in the midterms as a sure thing. Her suggestion to Big Tech companies was to make the same concessions in the United States that they’ve made in other countries before they have to.

“I believe in our country in the end,” she said.

More in Technology

Future Perfect
These stories could change how you feel about AIThese stories could change how you feel about AI
Future Perfect

From disaster warnings to drug development, how AI is generating real-world wins.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
Google as you know it is slowly dyingGoogle as you know it is slowly dying
Technology

The search giant’s midlife crisis is now your problem.

By Adam Clark Estes
Future Perfect
Why Pope Leo has so much to say about AI, briefly explainedWhy Pope Leo has so much to say about AI, briefly explained
Future Perfect

Pope Leo’s unusual crusade should be a model for every religion.

By Sigal Samuel
Future Perfect
One chilling forecast of our AI future is getting wide attention. How realistic is it?One chilling forecast of our AI future is getting wide attention. How realistic is it?
Future Perfect

Rapid changes from AI may be coming far faster than you imagine.

By Kelsey Piper
Philanthropy
Bill Gates shows what the end of perpetual philanthropy looks likeBill Gates shows what the end of perpetual philanthropy looks like
Philanthropy

Why billionaires need to give more — and give faster.

By Benjamin Soskis
Even Better
Should I teach my kids to use AI?Should I teach my kids to use AI?
Even Better

Now is a good time to think about tech training wheels.

By Anna North and Adam Clark Estes