Buy new:
Save with Used - Very Good

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign Hardcover – Deckle Edge, April 18, 2017
Purchase options and add-ons
It was never supposed to be this close. And of course she was supposed to win. How Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to Donald Trump is the riveting story of a sure thing gone off the rails. For every Comey revelation or hindsight acknowledgment about the electorate, no explanation of defeat can begin with anything other than the core problem of Hillary's campaign--the candidate herself.
Through deep access to insiders from the top to the bottom of the campaign, political writers Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes have reconstructed the key decisions and unseized opportunities, the well-intentioned misfires and the hidden thorns that turned a winnable contest into a devastating loss. Drawing on the authors' deep knowledge of Hillary from their previous book, the acclaimed biography HRC, Shattered offers an object lesson in how Hillary herself made victory an uphill battle, how her difficulty articulating a vision irreparably hobbled her impact with voters, and how the campaign failed to internalize the lessons of populist fury from the hard-fought primary against Bernie Sanders.
Moving blow-by-blow from the campaign's difficult birth through the bewildering terror of election night, Shattered tells an unforgettable story with urgent lessons both political and personal, filled with revelations that will change the way readers understand just what happened to America on November 8, 2016.
- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateApril 18, 2017
- Dimensions6.64 x 1.48 x 9.53 inches
- ISBN-100553447084
- ISBN-13978-0553447088
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
“[A] compelling new book... It’s the story of a wildly dysfunctional and ‘spirit-crushing’ campaign that embraced a flawed strategy (based on flawed data) that failed, repeatedly, to correct course... The blow-by-blow details in Shattered are nothing less than devastating... In fact, the portrait of the Clinton campaign that emerges from these pages is that of a Titanic-like disaster: an epic fail made up of a series of perverse and often avoidable missteps by an out-of-touch candidate and her strife-ridden staff.”
—New York Times
“How did she lose? Providing that answer is the mission accepted by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes in Shattered… They saw and heard far more than most of us, exploring deep inside ‘Clintonworld’ in search of the real story. And in these pages, they share enough of what they witnessed to enable us to reach our own conclusions… Allen and Parnes offer a first bridge beyond the journalism of the campaign year to the scholarship of the historians and other scholars who will process all this material for generations to come.”
—NPR
“Told largely through background interviews with campaign staff and a tangle [of] Clinton insiders, the book is a comprehensive chronicle of how her quest for the White House lurched and sputtered toward ignominious defeat… [Shattered is] richly reported.”
—TIME
"What Allen and Parnes captured in Shattered was a far more revealing portrait of the Democratic Party intelligentsia than, say, the WikiLeaks dumps. And while the book is profoundly unflattering to Hillary Clinton, the problem it describes really has nothing to do with Secretary Clinton. The real protagonist of this book is a Washington political establishment that has lost the ability to explain itself or its motives to people outside the Beltway... If the ending to this story were anything other than Donald Trump being elected president, Shattered would be an awesome comedy, like a Kafka novel—a lunatic bureaucracy devouring itself. But since the ending is the opposite of funny, it will likely be consumed as a cautionary tale."
—Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone
“Just like Game Change and Double Down, Shattered comes filled with plenty of juicy behind-the-scenes stories about the 2016 election… Compiled from anonymous interviews with more than 100 sources 'up and down the ranks of the campaign,' Shattered provides a detailed timeline of how a 'winnable race' was lost.”
—Entertainment Weekly
“For those who like political autopsies, I recommend the new book by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, Shattered.”
—Niall Ferguson, The Boston Globe
“This highly entertaining and fast-moving book provides an extensive analysis of what caused the failure of Hillary Clinton’s unwieldy and hugely expensive campaign to carry its highly favored candidate across the finish line.”
—The Washington Times
"This withering account of Hillary Clinton's Presidential campaign... yields a great deal of backroom color... the Clinton campaign never had a clear picture of its own candidate or of what was coming."
—The New Yorker
“Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes' exegesis of how Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 US Presidential Election to—do I even have to say his name?—is a thorough and, at points, dishy behind-the-scenes look at what went so horribly wrong in a campaign that clearly thought they had it right.”
—Vice
“A riveting account of the final, dreadful hours of Clinton’s long pursuit of the presidency… Thanks to Allen and Parnes, we now know how Clinton reacted, at the moment she was supposed to become the first female president.”
—Denver Post
“[Shattered] sheds particular light on the painful turn of events on election night, as Clinton watched the returns deviate dramatically from the path her campaign had so confidently predicted… As the first take on Clinton’s doomed campaign, [Allen and Parnes] offer a behind-the-scenes view of the obstacles in her way—some familiar and others a consequence of the shifting American electorate.”
—The Guardian
“Hillary Clinton’s loss at the hands of Donald Trump last November is the single biggest upset in modern presidential politics. I’ve spent the intervening months trying to understand what Clinton’s defeat said about the electorate, about Clinton and about the campaign she ran. Now, there’s a book that does all of that for me!”
—Chris Cillizza, CNN
“In the last weeks before the election, the Hillary Clinton campaign did no polling… This is one of the thousand revelations in Shattered, the new book by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes that, for political junkies, redefines the word ‘juicy’ for our time… Allen and Parnes pile up headshaking detail after headshaking detail from the very beginning of her campaign to its end.”
—New York Post
“We’ve waited five months but we finally have the first thorough dissection of the mangled road kill that is the Hillary for president campaign. It’s called Shattered… It’s full of revelations about Clinton’s failed campaign.”
—Tucker Carlson, host of Fox’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight”
“Gripping.”
—ABC’s “Good Morning America”
“Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, the new book by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, is absolutely gripping reading, chock full of juicy reporting about the Democratic nominee’s campaign that you really wish you had read during the actual campaign.”
—The National Review
“Writing in a lively and fast-paced narrative, Allen and Parnes use their unparalleled access… to richly document what it felt like to be aboard the Clinton Hindenburg…”
—Vox.com
“Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign should be required reading for anyone planning to run a political campaign.”
—Columbus Post-Dispatch
"[Allen and Parnes] have written the best making of the president book since the genre was created by Theodore H. White in 1960."
—Newsmax
“An in-depth dissection of Hillary Clinton's second campaign for the presidency, a failure on many counts… this readable, endlessly fascinating autopsy by Roll Call columnist Allen and The Hill White House correspondent Parnes, who co-authored HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton (2014)… A top-notch campaign examination. If, like so many others, you wonder what on earth happened in November 2016, this is all the explanation you need.”
—Kirkus Reviews (starred)
“Shattered provides a sharp behind-the-news and behind-the-scenes palette of details for a campaign that, in retrospect, seemed preordained to fail, and fail miserably.”
—The Globe and Mail
About the Author
AMIE PARNES is the senior political correspondent for The Hill newspaper in Washington and a CNN political analyst. She covered Hillary Clinton during the campaign and covers national politics.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
“Or I Wouldn’t Have Run”
Hillary clinton had a new rendezvous with destiny on her mind. Her motorcade sped toward Roosevelt Island on the morning of June 13, 2015. In a little more than an hour, she would officially kick off what she hoped would be a trailblazing, glass-ceiling-shattering campaign for the presidency. For most of the previous forty-eight hours, she had been trying to give a feel of historic importance to her first major address. It just wasn’t there yet.
She picked up the phone and called her chief speechwriter, Dan Schwerin. After two days of trading drafts with Hillary, after waiting through the delay of a power outage at her Chappaqua, New York, home, the bearded thirty-two-year-old with a signature chestnut pompadour was just about to board the tram connecting Manhattan to the East River island. He had stayed up all night, pulling together tweaks to the 3:30 a.m. version of the speech, and he looked hungover. Now, battling exhaustion and the sweltering heat, Schwerin pulled out his laptop one more time and sat down on the platform so that Hillary could dictate her final edits.
The key passage of the speech was an explanation of why she was running for president: “to make our economy work for you and for every American.” In the middle of that run—about how she would do it and who she would fight for—Hillary wanted to connect herself and her campaign to Franklin Roosevelt, the president who defined the aspirations of the Democratic Party and much of the nation for generations.
“Here on Roosevelt Island,” she said to Schwerin, “I believe we have a continuing rendezvous with destiny.”
He tapped the echo of FDR’s 1936 Democratic convention speech into his computer at 11 a.m. and took the next cable car to the island. Few would notice the last-minute change. The cluttered speech had become a testament to the aimlessness and passive-aggressive infighting that plagued the early stages of Hillary’s campaign. Hillary had tried to put together a team this time that would feature far less internal drama than her failed 2008 bid. Back then, big personalities had clashed openly, aired dirty laundry and strategy details in the press, and sometimes pursued their own goals at the expense of hers. In the intervening years, she’d assigned a lot of the blame for her loss to the warring inside her campaign. But that was hardly the only ailment from 2008 that she hoped to remedy. She hadn’t sold a vision for the country. She’d run away from being a woman instead of leaning into the unique aspect of her political story. To manage her campaign, she’d tapped a friend rather than the top pro. She’d let her husband run wild on the trail. And she had failed to take advantage of the latest technology to build a movement of grassroots supporters and donors.
From a strategic standpoint, she’d dumped millions of dollars into Iowa, the first-in-the-nation caucus, even though that only elevated the importance of her devastating third-place finish there. She’d gone on the attack against a better-liked rival whose platform more closely mirrored the values of the party’s base, creating a boomerang effect on her personal standing. Perhaps worst of all, she’d obsessed over winning the popular vote in big states rather than targeting the all-important delegates and superdelegates whose votes at the Democratic convention determined the party’s nominee.
But the idea burned into her mind as much as anything else was that she had lost because she’d hired people who put their own interests above getting her elected. The absence of palace intrigue on her opponent’s side—the “no drama Obama” campaign—was the kind of purpose-driven loyalty she pined for.
Over the next seven years, Hillary would rebuild her political organization while working at the State Department and the Clinton Foundation, punish those who had been disloyal to her, and prepare herself to mount a second bid for the most powerful job on the planet. When she conceded to Obama in 2008, she’d thanked voters for putting “18 million cracks” in the glass ceiling of the presidency. By the time she finished the 2016 campaign, she believed, that glass ceiling would lay shattered beneath her feet. And yet what Hillary couldn’t quite see is that no matter how she recast the supporting roles in this production, or emphasized different parts of the script, the main character hadn’t changed.
Huddled around a white table in the conference room of the Clintons’ midtown Manhattan personal office in the early spring of 2015, months before she would go to Roosevelt Island to deliver her first major address, the first hires of Hillary’s worst-kept-secret campaign outlined a plan to fly her to Iowa. They had pegged the Hawkeye State, where caucus-goers had doomed her first bid for the Oval Office, as the best spot for her kickoff speech. But Hillary didn’t like what she was hearing. She didn’t want to go big, at least not yet. And she didn’t want the first major address of what could be a history-making campaign to be set against a minimalistic backdrop like some farmer’s back porch.
To the chagrin of campaign manager Robby Mook, who would have to build a billion-dollar apparatus, Hillary had been dragging her feet about making things official. She understood that her team needed to start raising funds, hire more staff, and begin recruiting volunteers. But she also knew she had to be fully prepared for this battle. And she just wasn’t ready.
Mook, clean-cut with close-cropped brown hair and lively hazel eyes, was antsy. At one point, there was even discussion of his starring in a campaign-launching video announcing the formation of an “exploratory” committee. But Hillary was wary of repeating some of the major mistakes of her 2008 bid. She had rushed into her announcement that year to compete with Obama, and she had made it all about her: “I’m in it to win,” she’d said in her campaign-opening video. This time, she wanted to show she was listening to voters—talking with them one-on-one or in small groups and in informal settings (all with the knowledge that everything she did would be dutifully reported by a press corps hungry for nuggets from the trail).
“We’ve come so far under President Obama, but we have so many problems,” she told her advisers. “I want to make sure I’m the right person.” Given that everyone in the room had ostensibly been hired to run her campaign, and that some of them had been in on earlier discussions about the timing and logistics of her launch, no one believed she was really so ambivalent. But, sitting by a bank of three windows, twenty-seven floors above the bustle of Seventh Avenue, Hillary rendered a clear verdict on the Iowa kickoff plan: “No.”
She would go to Iowa in April, she said, but not to deliver a launch speech—and not in a private jet. She would drive, in a van, and try to find people along the way who weren’t expecting to run into her. After a quarter of a century locked inside the political bubble of the New York–to–Washington stretch of the Acela corridor, Hillary was eager to find out what people thought about the state of the country—and about her. She didn’t want to officially kick off the campaign until she’d had a chance to repeat what she’d done when she first ran for a New York Senate seat: gather information from voters. “She wanted to do that before giving a big speech and having a big event and saying ‘I have all this figured out,’ ” said one aide. “We didn’t have it all figured out.” Her big opening address would come at a location with more historic consequence, but for now, a “soft” launch could go forward—an upbeat video followed by the road trip.
The time would come for her to speak into the winds of history, but, as much as she knew Iowa wasn’t the place, she also knew that her moment hadn’t yet come. She’d been off the political battlefield for seven years. As secretary of state, she’d worked to win concessions in diplomatic back rooms across the world, but she didn’t have to worry about securing millions of votes. Barack Obama had been elected president and the Tea Party had risen in the time since she’d last been on the campaign trail as a candidate. The nation’s political bearings had shifted. And, if her 2014 book tour had taught her anything, it was that she was rusty as hell. Talking to voters, she hoped, would help her sharpen her political skills and develop her vision for the country’s future.
Obama had been relentlessly superb at telling voters why he was running for president and giving them a window into how he would govern. He was confident, cocky even, about his vision. Hillary, a modest, midwestern Methodist with a love of minutiae, was unshakably focused on the trees rather than the forest. This campaign would test the A student’s ability to adapt—to subordinate her nature to her need to win.
In preparing to campaign again, she studied Obama’s February 2007 launch speech in Springfield, the one he delivered on the steps of the Old State Capitol—the one that connected him with fellow Illinois state legislator Abraham Lincoln, who had freed the slaves in an act that set the first stone on Obama’s improbable path to the presidency. “She kept harkening back to Obama in Springfield,” said one of Hillary’s top advisers. “She had gone back to read that speech and how important it was for people as a marker of what he would do in the presidency. She viewed it as an important kind of road map for her governing principles and her actual plans to be president.”
In her mind, the first landmark address of what she hoped and believed would be a historic campaign couldn’t be about the politics of the moment, about tipping a few Iowa caucus-goers in her direction. It had to be about how she could reshape the nation from the Oval Office. For Hillary, a wonk in the best and worst senses of the word, that meant devising her policy agenda before she ever stepped to the podium. Most politicians understand that voters are looking for big, bold principles—easy-to-grasp concepts—and that the details can be filled in to fit them. For Hillary, policy is vision, and she would try to build a platform, program by program, into a blueprint for the country.
This prospect was actually a relief. It was more comfortable for her to sit in four-hour meetings at the conference table with her policy chief—the reedy, whip-smart Jake Sullivan—than to define herself by a small set of guiding principles and shape her policy ideas to fit them.
Hillary adored the thirty-eight-year-old Sullivan, enough to joke publicly about her confidence that he would someday be president of the United States. He had served Hillary as deputy chief of staff at State, a position from which he gradually vacuumed up all or parts of the jobs of several senior colleagues. Hillary appreciated both his competence and his ambition. His instincts on policy and politics matched hers. So she turned to him to run what she thought was the most important part of the campaign: the substance. That’s what bonded Hillary to her young protégé—they geeked out over policy—and it’s what she wanted at the heart of her first address to the voting public.
“This is her deeply held thing: elections should be about policy,” said one senior Hillary adviser. “There’s a textbook quality to her articulation of things.” That would make every step of narrative building its own form of excruciating drudgery. But it would soon seem like a minor nuisance for a campaign that was miserable even before it started.
In early March, just as she was planning to reintroduce herself to a nation that felt it knew her all too well with a video announcement of her campaign, the New York Times reported that Hillary had used an e‑mail address tied to a personal server at her family home in Chappaqua, to conduct official State Department business. The e‑mail story would bedevil her straight through Election Day, robbing her of the ability to create a positive narrative for her candidacy and, as one top adviser put it, returning to her like a cold sore. “You never know when it’s going to pop up,” this adviser said. “You think you’re over it and then [it pops]up again.”
At the time, it was impossible to know how long the e‑mail story would last and just how badly it would damage the campaign.
“Did you have any idea of the depth of this story?” campaign chairman John Podesta asked Mook when it broke.
“Nope,” Mook replied. “We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of.”
“That’s reassuring,” Podesta shot back. “Yikes.”
“Yeah,” Mook responded. “This is going to be an interesting campaign. I’m in this zen place now where I’m focusing on the website and telling myself this is all background noise!”
For those who couldn’t bury their heads, praying for divine intervention was an attractive alternative. “I’m lighting candles in church all the time,” pollster John Anzalone told Mook.
When the e‑mail story first hit, Hillary’s aides were still trying to get a feel for one another. The crisis acted as a catalyst for infighting. Publicly, she was running a no-drama campaign. But behind the scenes, Hillary’s brain trust broke into tribes:
•The Mook Mafia, led by Mook; Marlon Marshall, his top lieutenant; Elan Kriegel, the data analytics chief; and Oren Shur, the paid media director
•The State Crew, led on the inside by Huma Abedin, the vice chairwoman; Jake Sullivan; Nick Merrill, the traveling press secretary; and Dan Schwerin, the chief speechwriter; with longtime Clinton advisers Cheryl Mills and Philippe Reines invisibly guiding Hillary behind the scenes
•The Consultants, led by Joel Benenson, the chief strategist; Jim Margolis, the ad-maker; and Mandy Grunwald, the longtime Clinton message maven
•The Communications Shop, led by Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director; Kristina Schake, her deputy; and Christina Reynolds, the research director, who had worked with Palmieri on the John Edwards campaign
At the start, Podesta was seen as a high-level troubleshooter. Short, wiry, and in his midsixties, the marathon-running former top aide to Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama had deep ties to every power center in the Democratic Party. He was supposed to play an adult-in-the-room role on the campaign, coordinating with Bill’s office, the White House, Democratic interest groups, and major donors. In theory, Podesta would provide air cover in Clintonworld, lessening the burden on Mook and allowing the campaign manager to focus on executing.
Product details
- Publisher : Crown
- Publication date : April 18, 2017
- Edition : First Edition
- Language : English
- Print length : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0553447084
- ISBN-13 : 978-0553447088
- Item Weight : 1.62 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.64 x 1.48 x 9.53 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #159,715 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5 in Women in Politics (Books)
- #33 in Elections
- #188 in Political Leader Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
Jonathan Allen is an award-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author who covers national politics for NBC News.
Formerly the Washington bureau chief for Bloomberg News and the White House bureau chief for Politico, Jonathan is a winner of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Award for reporting on Congress and the Sandy Hume Memorial Award for excellence in political journalism. He has been a frequent guest political analyst on national television programs for the past 20 years and teaches a course on presidential politics at Northwestern University.
"FIGHT: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House" is his fourth book with Amie Parnes.
Their first two books, "Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign" and "HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton," were both New York Times bestsellers. "Shattered" reached No. 1 on the list. They are also the authors of "Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency."
Jonathan, who grew up in Silver Spring and Bethesda, Md., is a graduate of the University of Maryland and lives on Capitol Hill with his wife and two children. Before graduating from Maryland, he played baseball at St. Mary's College in Southern Maryland.
Amie Parnes is a senior political correspondent at The Hill, where she covers national politics. Parnes is also a #1 New York Times bestselling author and has published three books including Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, alongside her co-author Jon Allen of NBC News. As a veteran journalist with more than 25 years of experience, Parnes has covered three administrations and five presidential campaigns. She has served as a CNN Political Analyst and has extensive television experience.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book fascinating and well-researched, with one review noting how the authors walk readers through the campaign's twists. Moreover, the book provides a great look at the campaign from the inside. However, the writing quality receives mixed feedback, with some saying it's well-written while others find it uneven. Additionally, customers disagree on the level of detail and organization, with some appreciating the well-paced narrative while others find it tedious. Character development also divides opinions, with some praising the revealing insights while others criticize Hillary Clinton's personality.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book highly readable, describing it as a fascinating and fun read, with one customer noting how the authors expertly guide readers through various twists and turns in the narrative.
"...Great book that dives into the mismanagement of her campaign...." Read more
"...Great read, even if it does raise your blood pressure." Read more
"...Good read" Read more
"...The book is worth the money and a good read." Read more
Customers find the book provides great insight and is meticulously researched, with interesting details throughout.
"...Like a number of other reviewers, I found it interesting and informative--and also biased...." Read more
"...Very informative and well reported on." Read more
"Well researched and well written, "Shattered" is almost, but not quite, undone but the authors' bias for Hillary Clinton and against Donald..." Read more
"Fascinating and could not put the book down! The book is extraordinarily detailed with very little insertion of the author's opinions...." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's look, describing it as an insightful and detailed examination of the campaign from the inside.
"...In any case this is a highly entertaining and insightful look at one of the most tumultuous presidential campaigns in history. RJB." Read more
"This book was very true and gives one a good look at what went on behind the scenes. It explains why Clinton lost...." Read more
"A must read fantastic look on to the losing mess. Proves what a terrible candidate she was. God help us if she. Was elected." Read more
"The only reason I voted for Trump was to read this book. Beautiful." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the writing quality of the book, with some finding it well written and very readable, while others note it is unevenly written.
"The reporting reads as accurate, and well sourced. well written and interesting, but with some odd omissions. -..." Read more
"...I found the book to not be credible and to be poorly written...." Read more
"...Well written and, in this time of intense political polarization, a fair and objective telling of the story of this past election." Read more
"...This book is an easy read with exposure of the little known workings of the political machine. This book is a reality check on just how close..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the character development in the book, with some appreciating the revealing insights into characters' strengths, while others criticize Hillary Clinton as a really wretched woman.
"...end result as the logical conclusion of a terrible campaign and a flawed candidate." Read more
"...Their own polls showed the public perceived her as corrupt, dishonest, and a perpetual liar. So, nominate her! What could go wrong?..." Read more
"...For would-be campaign operatives, it is also a morality tale on two key lessons in campaign management: (a) Do not rely exclusively one method of..." Read more
"...over-talked or just barrelled ahead in a manner that was boorish, arrogant, overbearing, and corroborated Donald's overdubbed "nasty" remark...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the book's organization, with some praising its solid effort and great skill, while others describe it as very dysfunctional and note that it becomes somewhat disorganized.
"...All along we, via this book, are seeing this dysfunctional campaign as if it is slowly unraveling and that Hillary is slowly losing what can be..." Read more
"...of the Clinton 2016 Presidential Campaign disaster are credible, if disjointed...." Read more
"...how it's interpreted, the book nevertheless offers a fascinating glimpse into an organization that wanted to be secretive, but couldn't quite pull..." Read more
"Shattered Expectations..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the pacing of the book, with some finding it well-paced and an excellent fast read, while others describe it as tedious and hastily written.
"...difficult to get into; so many minute details are boring and make for slow reading but if you hang in there the info is fascinating." Read more
"Detailed, engaging, readable overview of the primary and general election. Seemed fair and unbiased...." Read more
"This was a hard read with a lot of redundancy and boring detail...." Read more
"Disappointed. The book appears rushed, even though they supposedly took their time to get it right. Not as well written as I had hoped." Read more
Reviews with images

Damaged!
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2017Format: KindleVerified PurchaseRequired reading for any future candidate or campaign manager. It does an exceptional job of showing the reader what really goes on in a modern presidential campaign. For would-be campaign operatives, it is also a morality tale on two key lessons in campaign management: (a) Do not rely exclusively one method of gathering data; and (b) Listen to local operatives on the ground - as Tip O'Neill famously said "all politics is local".
PROS: Few books on the market provide such an in-depth view of the inner workings of a presidential campaign. The reader really does feel like they are a fly on the wall in the conference rooms, hallways, and back stage waiting rooms during the campaign and its immediate aftermath. For those looking to understand the results of the 2016, you really must read this book. It strikes a fairly neutral tone (for ostensibly Pro-Clinton authors) that seriously attempts to provide the "story" of the campaign through the people that lived it and allows the reader to draw conclusions.
CONS: As I said above, the reader really is a fly on the wall in the campaign, and I can tell you from experience that campaigns are not always exciting. There are periods of the book that are fairly dry and feel like "Day 242: Campaign manager said something funny. Hillary laughed. We ordered take out." I forgive these passages because this is real life campaigning, but those wanting a page-turner from front to cover will find portions wanting.
RESPONSE TO OTHER REVIEWS: When reading any non-fiction book, the reader should always understand the inherent biases of the authors and read critically, and this book is no exception. The authors received the access they did because they are fairly pro-Clinton and this book is written largely from the stories of the people running Sec. Clinton's campaign - as such, you will see some perspectives or characterizations of Sen. Bernie Sanders and President Donald Trump with which their supporters may disagree. This has been much discussed in the reviews, but again I do not think it takes away from the value of the book. Additionally, while the authors do have a Pro-Clinton bias, they often appear to ascribe much of the blame to the candidate herself. Many have seized on this as a reason to condemn the book, but I think that is unfair to the authors who do a very good job of providing enough information for the reader to draw their own conclusions. Finally, much has been made of the author's use of unnamed sources. Normally this would be an issue, but due to the nature of this book and the fact that those in it are generally still in the political realm and the wounds still raw, it make sense. The book is nonetheless credible because: (1) the authors had the level of access they claimed to have; (2) the unnamed sources are largely corroborated by public statements and known facts; and (3) the sheer number of sources. The book also includes a lengthy bibliography of public sources for each chapter.
CONCLUSION: The lasting legacy of this book will be its insider's view of a modern presidential campaign. I expect it to be assigned in political science and political history courses for a long time to come. For those seeking to understand the 2016 election, it also offers a largely unvarnished, raw perspective from the Clinton campaign and many of those in the Clinton orbit. This is an invaluable contribution to analysis of the 2016 election. Going forward, it would be excellent to see a companion book about the Trump campaign to complement this one. I highly recommend this book for anyone interesting in political campaigns generally or the 2016 election.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2018Format: KindleVerified PurchaseI'm an immigrant, a mathematician, and a stay at home mom of four kids. I pay no attention to politics because it's boring. I came to America back when Bill Clinton was running for president. A few years later, I heard that the president's wife also wanted to be a president, and she even introduced some healthcare bill into congress. A lot of people around me were furious about it. Over the years, Hillary Clinton ascended in power, obviously aiming for reentering the White House. She gained a lot of suport, but the hatred of her also festered under the surface.
At the beginning of the 2016 primary season, my husband said to me, "Who do you think is going to be the next president?" I said Hillary Clinton, obviously. Then he said, "Donald Trump is running for president." I said, "He is???" I thought about it for a moment, then I said, "Yes, he will win. He can actually beat Hillary Clinton."
Three years later, I just finished this book Shattered. It's the first (and likely last) political book I've ever paid money for. While I don't normally care about politics, the 2016 election was unusually interesting. My impression of Hillary Clinton has always been that she is ambitious and persistent, but she is not a leader. I bought this book to see if my impression is correct. It says that during the campaign, HRC hired a bunch of talented people, but she didn't set up a proper chain of command, so nobody was really the boss, and there was a lot of infighting. HRC only talked to one aide; the rest of the senior aides never got to see her face to face. And that one aide happened to be the wife of Anthony Wiener. She counted all criticisms as disloyalty, so nobody dared to tell her what she was doing wrong. Hillary's email problem would have gone away early if she had simply apologized, but she refused to apologize until many months later, when the problem became imbedded into people's minds. When she doesn't like an aide, she doesn't fire him, she just alienated him. When she lost a state to Bernie Sanders, she would scream at her aides via a conference phone, but when she won, she knew it was because of her, not her aides.
During the primaries, when Hillary loses a state, she freaks out even though it was obvious that she was going to beat Sanders. The book doesn't mention the fact that Hillary had some 500 superdelegates piled on top of her at the start, so it was almost impossible for her lose. She wastes so much emotional energy over minor losses rather than keep her focus on the big picture.
The book said several times that Hillary's campaign "can't have good things," due to all the problems they experienced: her email, the FBI, Russians, Wikileaks and so on. What the book doesn't mention, and indeed I've never seen any political pundit mention it, is that Hillary Clinton has the best thing ever. Every common folk knows this. For example, what is the difference between Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren (or any other female politician)? Answer: HRC married the president. If it wasn't for her marriage, she would have never made it to be senator of New York, or Secretary of State, or democratic nominee. Even I remember back when Hillary Clinton decided to become a senator, chose a state (New York), bought a house there to establish residency, ran, and won. Becoming a senator for her was like getting a job flipping burgers. Can any other woman politician do that? If she had won the presidency, it wouldn't mean that girls can become president; it would only mean that girls who managed to marry presidents can become presidents. HRC has had an unfair advantage over other female politicians for years. She has never won any election on her own merit, which was why she lost to a newbie Obama and even newer newbie Donald Trump. She doesn't know how to run a campaign because she is not a leader.
The book also doesn't go into why the polls and analytics were so consistently skewed in favor of Hillary, and thereby setting her up for the biggest shock in US election history. Normally, statistics numbers are too low here and too high there such that things even out. The book also says that Hillary's campaign slogan was called "breaking barriers." I've never heard of it. Later it became "Stronger Together." That didn't catch on, so it was eventually "I'm with her." The book says Hillary never could voice a clear reason why she wanted to be president.
The main reason I bought the book was because I wanted to know how she felt during election night. The book provided no interesting information, however. Hillary just sat there, stone faced, and eventually called Trump to concede after Obama nagged her into it, that's all. Podesta decided on his own to go to the Javits Center to kick people out because the building was due for other bookings, and Hillary wasn't doing a thing.
There is one thing I learned from the book that I never knew before. It says that when Hillary was giving her democratic nomination acceptance speech, she was getting booed by Sanders supporters. To cover up the boos, her team had strategic cheering people all over the stadium such that whenever a boo started, the cheering people would immediately cheer loudly to cover up the boos. As a result, Hillary was cheered at odd times. Sort of like canned laughter on sitcom shows. I did not know they did that.
The book emphasized on how Obama supported Hillary. Does Obama really thinks highly of Hillary? I don't believe it because I feel that back when Obama put Hillary as Secretary of State, it was a trade-off so that she would concede the primary election. (I don't know this, it just felt that way.) There was no other reason for Obama to do it, and he certainly laid her off after just one term.
The book stresses several times that Hillary didn't have enough money to campaign on the ground in Wisconsin and Michigan.
Overall, the book is worth buying. It gives a lot of information that one would not know from reading internet articles. The kindle version works nicely. I've been looking for a similar objective book on Trump's campaign but can't find it.
Top reviews from other countries
- Joel GoldenbergReviewed in Canada on April 22, 2017
5.0 out of 5 stars A riveting read. Couldn't put it down. Probably will be the definitive account of the Clinton campaign. Many politicians can use
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseAn excellent read which will likely be the definitive account of the Hillary campaign and a good lesson for other politicians as they map out strategy.
-
Andreas TitzeReviewed in Germany on November 3, 2023
5.0 out of 5 stars Tolles Wahlkampf-Buch!
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseUnfassbar detailreiche und hochspannende Einblicke in die Clinton-Kampagne. Die Quellenlage ist absolut beeindruckend und der Wissensgewinn groß. Der Teil mit den Primaries hätte insgesamt etwas kürzer sein können, aber durch diese wenigen Längen kämpft man sich durch. Der eigentliche Wahlkampf ist spannend beschrieben, obwohl man ja weiß wie es ausgeht. Für Politiknerds ein echtes Vergnügen!
- j.m.f. thuijlsReviewed in Australia on May 31, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating insight into a bizarre election
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseGreat book. As a non-American I never understood the intensity with which Americans fight for the presidency. This book not only showed what happens within a presidential campaign, but also shows just how bizarre the 2016 elections were. I also found the portrayal of Hillary to be quite sympathetic. I would have never voted for her, but this book gave me the opportunity to see a human, even gentle side to her.
- Kurian KurienReviewed in India on June 15, 2017
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book. Fast paced
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseIt's written so well and it's a definite page turner. It gives a definite insight into the inner workings of the Clinton world. A great read.
- Experienced IT ManReviewed in the United Kingdom on May 22, 2017
5.0 out of 5 stars A book with a happy ending
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseA great read with a happy ending. Read how the Clinton campaign really messed up with a flawed candidate and Mook relying on the polling data and ignoring the "gut feel" of experienced Democrat leaders, and Bill Clinton. The book is written by people who were sympathetic to Clinton. Read how Kaine was a compromise VP thrust onto Clinton. They had never met before he was picked. Read how Bernie played hard-ball to get his endorsement of Clinton. They tell the story of how they took minority Democrat supporters for granted and couldn't read the Rust Belt. Even when the results began to go south they were clinging onto Florida as the path to 270.